SC agrees to examine NE states’ plea for pan India lottery


NEW DELHI: Meghalaya led the charge in the Supreme Court on Friday for permission to states to run pan-India lotteries by seeking review of the court’s earlier decision and challenging the validity of Section 5 of the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998.
Appearing for Meghalaya, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana that the hilly north-eastern states are small in size and a major chunk of their revenue used to come from running lotteries.
He said the financial condition of these states have suffered majorly during the pandemic and requested the court to lift the restriction imposed by the SC – a state can run a business in lottery in another state if the latter too was organizing lotteries. Which meant, a state which did not organize lotteries can ban lotteries of other states.
For Sikkim, senior advocate A M Singhvi said that the Lotteries Act is a central legislation, the subject being covered by List I. However, under Section 5, the Centre has impermissibly delegated the power to regulate lotteries to states though they cannot have any regulatory power over a central list subject in a federal structure like India, he argued.
The bench asked additional solicitor general Sanjay jain to spell out the Centre’s stand in two weeks and posted the matter for hearing on August 17.
According to Rohatgi, at present only Kerala, Maharashtra, Punjab, Sikkim, Meghalaya, Goa and West Bengal have state-organised lotteries and hence these states can run their lotteries in these seven states only. Chhattisgarh counsel Sumeer Sodhi opposed the plea saying the SC had rightly put the restriction considering the socio-economic impact of lotteries on the general public, especially the poor.
CJI Ramana said one can understand restrictions on private-run lotteries as there could be some apprehension about the transparency of draws, but the same may not be true for state-organised lotteries as some credibility is attached to them being run by the government itself.
Agreeing with Rohatgi, the CJI said, “In a federal structure, can one state ban the trading of goods, in this case lottery tickets, of one state in its territory? Is this logical? Let the Centre make its stand clear.





Source link

Related posts:

Rdif Says Putnik V And Sputnik Light Booster Effective Against Omicron - दावा: ओमिक्रॉन के खिलाफ रूस...
Oppo reno 7 pro 5g first sale live today 8 february 2022 know best offers and discount on flipkart g...
Jammu And Kashmir: Seven Houses Ashes In Fire In Srinagar One Woman Dead - जम्मू-कश्मीर: श्रीनगर में...
Modi government big announcement for fertilizer subsidy and pm kisan samman nidhi scheme budget 2022...
Dealer will give printed RC immediately in delhi vehicles registration certificate RTO dl news nodrs...
BJP MLA Ashok Lahoti says we are old history sheeter Sanganer road dispute Pushpendra Bhardwaj video...
Elderly woman could not bear the grief of her husband death committed suicide hrrm
BMO Zoya Khan News: BMO Zoya Khan dancing on o aithey aa with husband imran khan, song is from Bolly...
WBBL: सिडनी थंडर की जीत में स्मृति मंधाना, शैफाली वर्मा के लिए निराशाजनक दिन | क्रिकेट खबर
Cm shivraj singh chauhan met pm narendra modi invitation to visit mp foundation stone laying of ken ...
Woman strip man drugged and made nude video blackmail for 50 lakhs honeytrap gang in gwalior cgpg
Nursing Home Sealed For Illegal Abortion In Gwalior, Registration Of Doctors Will Be Canceled - ग्वा...
Delhi: Miscreants Robbed A Bag Full Of Cash And Jewelery From The Groom's Brother, Case Registered -...
amid ukraine tensions vladimir putin ready to compromise after talks with emmanuel macron - Ukraine ...
Rape threatens given 19 year old NCC girl cadet by Senior in Lohia College Churu money thrown on her...
Home remedies for after delivery hair fall pra

Leave a Comment